The Announcement Cloud- Cisco, IBM, Sun, Microsfot and Amazon have all made announcements in Cloud Computing space. This will be the first of the three blogs. The second blog will analyze the market requirements for Internet and Web 2.0 companies, and the third will propose a "New Century" SOA and Cloud Computing Target Reference Architecture.
“Close, but no cigar?”
In the high tech world, it is often a case of: “Close, but no cigar”. A company may have a winning product, but competition could have an even better product. So is the Cisco “Unified Computing” likely to become a case of “Close, but no cigar”? Or could it be another example of Cisco producing another winning product. You be the judge.
More than 20% of servers sold in the world are now bought by large players like Google, Amazon and Microsoft. Managing these servers one at a time is impossible. This has made Cloud Computing all but inevitable. Cloud Computing involves integration of computing, networking and storage in a single environment. Cisco thinks that the product it has announced that is a “Winner”. The product in my opinion can quite rightfully be dubbed a “Data Center” in a box. It integrates storage, network and computing virtualization. I think this box along with the software from BMC could become the foundation on which corporations could create private clouds in their datacenters.
What did Cisco Announce?
Cisco announced an integrated environment which integrates a blade server, storage and network fabric.
It also announced a blade server that is based on Nehalem processors; It is not yet another blade server in my opinion. It is based on technology that Cisco bought in a spin-in. It allows support for much larger memory banks, and can thus support servers with much larger datasets. Consider databases/OLAP applications that process much larger datasets, or application servers that support much larger heap sizes, or application level caches(like GigaSpaces)that are much larger in size. It is not an also ran blade server, as is being claimed by the competition.
Currently, setting up a datacenter is a manual and tedious process. Cisco simplifies this process using BMC Management software and hardware that integrates virtualization, storage and network virtualization.
Who is the main target?
The main target appears to be large Enterprises who have complex requirements for their datacenters. It does not appear to be targeted at the lowest cost seeking Internet companies. Some of the features (such as larger memory, or sophisticated security and virtualization) may not be of enough interest to Internet companies to justify the price. Medium and small businesses may also not require the features mentioned here.
Highlights of Remarks by John Chamberlain
“Cisco does not announce point products”
Cisco sees the Unified Computing Initiative as a long term strategy with which it will unite storage, virtualization and computing needs. They have certainly put a good package together: Networking cards optimized for performance and virtualization; A blade server that uses Neheleium effectively, and more importantly integrates new technology that allows much larger amount of memory; as well as a Software Solution that makes constructing a Data Center quite simple.
“Cisco sees datacenter computing power merging all the way into the home”
This caught me a little by surprise, as there is no clear indication of how this will be done. Cisco has wanted to be a fixture in the living room and on consumer desktops for years. Acquisitions like LinkSys(routers), Scientific Atlanta(set-top boxes), FlipVideo(Home Video uploaded to Internet) as well as PostPath(Email) have not quite succeded in establishing Cisco as a presence in the livingroom. However, succeeding in the consumer market is not easy, where competition can be quite fierce. It is a very low gross margin business, compared with the main networking business of Cisco. However, I do have some pointers to the Cisco vision to realize this. With the Uncertainity and flux involved in this, I would love to share this information, but only privately. (Please email me technicalarchitect2007 at gmail dot com . )
Interesting points from Cisco CTO Padmasree Warrior
After the warning shot over the bow, came the olive branch. Padmasree Warrior(like me an alumna of IIT Delhi) , was given a difficult task: Explain product features with clarity(which she did extremely well) , even while downplaying that this is igniting a turf war with HP.
“Cisco has not announced a new product. It has announced a Common Architecture linking data resources, Virtualization products and storage. Burden of Systems Integration is still on the customer. Constructing a datacenter with integrated storage, networking and compute resources is a manual complex process, that many customers do not know how to do well.”(Paraphrased remarks)
Padmasree Warrior was given the thankless job of downplaying the vision outlined by John T. Chamberlain. Her cry for peace and love among industry players is appropriate, but sounds almost plaintive, given the broadside from HP(see below. )
What did the competition say?
HP: “Cisco should launch its blade server in the museum”
“Following the Cisco launch, HP sent a strongly-worded response to the media raising a number of criticisms of Cisco’s approach with UCS. The release said it was “appropriate that Cisco launch(ed) their server in a museum” as the notion of unified compute, network and storage as a system was debuted with the first blades five years ago. It also questioned if you would “let a plumber build your house,” claiming Cisco’s “network-centric” view of the data centre is incomplete, and dubbed UCS as “Cisco’s Hotel California” claiming a lack of standards compatibility.”
I disagree with this assessment of the blade server. By supporting much higher levels of memory(see here) , it may be possible to do so much more than with the HP Blade Server. Everything can run faster with much higher amount of memory- from database servers to Java Application servers with larger heap sizes.
I would love to post an update, if HP were to give me data about why their blade servers can also support equivalent amount of memory, and a roadmap for their launch.
The more substantial response:
“Cisco is providing a vision with their UCS approach they’ve pre-announced, but to us that’s a vision HP is delivering on today,” said Christianotoulos. “It’s a vision for them, but for us it’s a reality today with Adaptive Infrastructure from HP.”
At the end of the day, while competitors come and go, Christianotoulos said HP has been a leader in the server segment for 20 years and remains focused on reducing cost and complexity in the data centre, regardless of competition from Cisco or others.
Has it been a long winter in Sunny california? Or maybe it is due to lack of enough love from Wall Street: But it appears that HP needs validation too.
“To be dead honest, the Cisco news is a bit of a compliment for us, I believe,” said Matt Zanner, worldwide director of data center solutions for HP Procurve, the networking division of HP. HP laid out a new open networking concept with a new family of switches in January, which provides “strong validation that we are headed in the right direction as well,” Zanner said.
How did Goldman Sachs, stock market and the financial institutions react?
Goldman Sachs was enthusiastic. It added Cisco to the “Conviction Buy” list.
“Fresh off Monday’s fanfare around its server introduction, Cisco (CSCO Quote – Cramer on CSCO – Stock Picks) was placed on Goldman Sachs’ conviction buy list Tuesday with a price target of $18. In a somewhat apt switch, Goldman dropped Hewlett-Packard (HPQ Quote – Cramer on HPQ – Stock Picks) from its list last week. The shift coincides with Cisco’s bold and somewhat risky strategy to attack H-P’s network server turf. “
Why has Cisco pre-announced this product?
The speculation is that this is to stop customers from signing contracts with competition. Customers who do want to benefit from Nehelium, and the new Cisco Blade server technology, are well advised to wait for the UCS launch this summer.
Some may say that unless a product is actually launched, it is impossible to decide whether it is “vaporware” or not.
Our takeaway: It is definitely not a point innovation, nor is it a revolutionary invention.
Cisco USC is definitely not a point innovation, neither is it a revolutionary invention. The cost savings promised by Cisco, could potentially be matched by others. Veteran competitors like HP may be able to create better blade servers, and put together equivalent products using other networking gear.
Cisco has definitely taken a lead in the emerging convergence of storage, virtualization and computing power.